The Baptism of Jesus in Matthew’s Gospel

I just received word that my paper, The Baptism of Jesus and the Fulfillment of All Righteousness: An Exploration of Jesus’ Relationship to Israel in Matthew 3:13-17, has been accepted for presentation (publication) at this year’s regional meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society.

This year’s Southeastern Regional meeting will be held, lucky for me, on SEBTS’ (Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary) campus.  It will be on March 23-24, though I am unsure of the date and time I will be scheduled to present.  You are welcome to come see me flounder as I make my first “appearance” in the scholarly theological world.  The paper’s thesis is as follows: “It is this paper’s contention that Matthew intends his readers to understand Jesus’ baptism through the lens of an exodus event wherein Jesus passes through the Red Sea as the representative head of Israel in order to succeed at all points where Israel has failed, thus fulfilling all righteousness.”

You can find out more about the conference and register to attend here.  The conference theme is “Biblical Theology: Current Trends and Future Prospects.”  The main speakers are Paul House, Scott Hafemann, and Andreas Köstenberger.

Posted in Biblical Studies, New Testament Studies, NT Greek | Tagged , , | 6 Comments

January: Progress Through GNT and Vulgate

January has come and gone; a month of twelve has passed away in this new year.  As of today, I have finished translating up through Matthew 23 in both the Greek New Testament and the Latin Vulgate.  Quite a few things have come out of my study of Matthew:

  1. A renewed interest in Matthew’s portrayal of the baptism of Jesus.
  2. A lesson in humility (see Are You Childlike?)
  3. I did a Latin Experiment where I found that a negotiating man sold all he had in search of a good margarita (this was based on the fallacy where some preachers/teachers recognize similarities between the word he is translating and a word in his own vocabulary.  Instead of translating the word, he opts to adopt the nuance associated with the word in his own vocabulary).

Here is to praying that I will continue to learn and be convicted as I finished Matthew and move on to Mark.

Posted in Life, NT Greek | Tagged | Leave a comment

Chesterton and the “Occupy” Movement

As you might have noticed, I am reading Chesteron’s book Orthodoxy.  So far, chapter three has been full of rich little gems.  Here is one that I believe applies to the occupy movement, which seems to have all but fizzled out.

But the new rebel is a Sceptic, and will not entirely trust anything.  He has no loyalty; therefore he can never be really a revolutionist.  And the fact that he doubts everything really gets in his way when he wants to denounce anything.  For all denunciation implies a moral doctrine of some kind; and the modern revolutionist doubts not only the institution he denounces, but the doctrine by which he denounces it.

This also reminds me of Jesus’ response to the Pharisees when they claim that he casts demons out in the name of Satan.  “A house divided against itself cannot stand.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Chesterton on Humility

But what we suffer from today is humility in the wrong place.  Modesty has moved from the organ of ambition.  Modesty has settled upon the organ of conviction; where it was never meant to be.  A man was meant to be doubtful about himself, but undoubting about the truth; this has been exactly reversed.  Nowadays the part of a man that a man does assert is exactly the part he ought not to assert – himself.  The part he doubts is exactly the part he ought not to doubt – the Divine Reason.  Huxley preached a humility content to learn from Nature.  But the new sceptic is so humble that he doubts if he can even learn.  Thus we should be wrong if we had said hastily that there is no humility typical of our time.  The truth is that there is a real humility typical of our time; but it so happens that it is practically a more poisonous humility than the wildest prostrations of the ascetic.  The old humility was a spur that prevented a man from stopping; not a nail in his boot that prevented him from going on.  For the old humility made a man doubtful about his efforts, which might make him work harder.  But the new humility makes a man doubtful about his aims, which will make him stop working altogether.

-Chesterton, Orthodoxy

 

Posted in Life, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Are You Childlike?

Are you childlike? Last night I was reading in Matt. 18:3-4 which says, “Truly, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven. Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.” Children are teachable. Children are humble. Children are dependent and must rely upon their parents.

Dr. Black often uses children as an example in his language classes. He says something to this affect, “I believe that children acquire language easier than adults because they are humble. When they speak, they are constantly subject to correction. How is this correction received? It is received with humility…the child does not become enraged but continues speaking.”

Over the past 4-5 years I have served in both pastoral and teaching roles. I worked alongside the pastors and elders in my local congregation, and I was always in theological dialogue with them. When a sermon was preached I was often asked to provide immediate criticism. Even when I was not asked for my input I was always listening to the sermon and developing a list of criticisms.

“What is wrong with theological discussion and listening critically?,” you might ask. Nothing. But it is easy to stand outside teaching as a critic instead of placing oneself under biblical truths proclaimed in order to be critiqued and transformed accordingly. It is easy to think ourselves mature and no longer in need of correction.

My recent transition to a new church entailed leaving behind my internship, which included preaching, teaching, critiquing and any other “ings” you can come up with associated with some form of authority.  I am no longer in a position of authority.  Few people know who I am, as if to say I am someone special.

This has been a healthy experience.  Even though I am not serving in a teaching capacity, I am actively involved in our new home.  Few know that I graduated from SEBTS with an MDiv.  Even fewer know that I have doctoral aspirations.  I try not to make these things public knowledge; I want to sit under teaching.  I know that in Matthew Jesus is speaking about the hearts of those who will inherit the kingdom of heaven.  The passage is contrasted with the rich man who asks, “What must I do to inherit eternal life” and the disciples questions, “Who will be greatest in the kingdom of heaven.”  Nevertheless, I think that the truth should still be characteristic of the believer.  Am I childlike?  Am I always looking to my heavenly Father for direction?  Am I constantly looking to his Son?  Am I submitting myself to His truths proclaimed through His servants?

This has been excruciatingly humbling experience.   There are a great number of moments that I want to take the reigns and start teaching/instructing.  I want to dismiss what I am being taught because it could be articulated better.  I want to say, “Hey! I’m important, don’t you know who I am?”  Pride constantly rears its ugly head and whispers in my ears, “you’re are special and more important than others.”  I must constantly look to my Father in order to help win this game of Whack-a-Mole.

Posted in Life, New Testament Studies | Tagged | 1 Comment

German Grammar I

Today marks the day I become truly serious about German.  Mary Beth and I will be taking a conversational German class offered by local community college this evening.  Wish us luck as we continue down this road toward Germany.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

G.K. Chesteron’s Orthodoxy and Selena Gomez

It was entirely by coincidence that I began reading this book the same week I decided to tune-in to one of our syndicated pop-music radio stations here in Raleigh NC.  No, I don’t like pop-music.  No, I didn’t expect to here anything particularly good.  No, I’m not so old as to tune-in simply to find out what horrible music those “young folk” are listening to these days.  I was simply interested in finding out what music was particularly “popular” at the start of this fine year.

I came across Selena Gomez’ song Love you Like a Love Song.  You can watch the music video below.  

I found some parallels with the lyrics of this song and the introduction of Chesteron’s book, wherein he provides his readers with an anecdote about his book’s potential lack of novelty.  Allow me to share:

I have often had a fancy for writing a romance about an English yachtsman who slightly miscalculated his course and discovered England under the impression that it was a new island in the South Seas.  I always find, however, that I am either too busy or too lazy to write this fine work, so I may as well give it away for the purposes of philosophical illustration.  There will probably be a general impression that the man who landed (armed to the teeth and talking by signs) to plant the British flag on that barbaric temple which turned out to be the Pavilion at Brighton, felt rather a fool.  I am not here concerned to deny that he looked a fool.  But if you imagine that he felt a fool, or at any rate that the sense of folly was his sole or his dominant emotion, then you have not studied with sufficient delicacy the rich romantic nature of the hero of this tale.  His mistake was really a most enviable mistake; and he knew it, if he was the man I take him for.  What could be more delightful than to have in the same few minutes all the fascinating terrors of going abroad combined with all the humane security of coming home again?  What could be better than to have all the fun of discovering South Africa without the disgusting necessity of landing there?  What could be more glorious than to brace one’s self up to discover New South Wales and then realize, with a gush of happy tears, that it was really old South Wales…

Chesterton goes on the relate this story to his own work:

For if this book is a joke it is a joke against me.  I am the man who with the utmost daring discovered what had been discovered before.  If there is an element of farce in what follows, the farce is at my own expense; for this book explains how I fancied I was the first to set foot in Brighton and then found I was the last.

Gomez’ realization that “every beautiful thought has already been sung” resounds with Chesterton’s fear that he will be the last to set foot in Brighton.  Yet the two diverge as Chesterton sets sail while Gomez keeps her ship docked at bay.  This wouldn’t be so bad if Gomez sat on her little yacht sipping margaritas (virgin of course), and drank in the noon-day sun.  Yet, even though she has never left the shore, her song proclaims that she in fact found New Whales: “It’s been said and done, Every beautiful thought’s been already sung, And I guess right now here’s another one, So your melody will play on and on, with the best of ’em.

I feel like an adolescent with a thesaurus is describing what it felt like when she discovered her first crush.  Next on her list, simile.  I know that you’re only 19…but still…you’re “supposedly” an artist…be creative…or something.

Posted in Life | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Membership in a Local Church: Revisited

[update]Nathaniel Cooley pointed me to Mark A. Herzer’s article, The Church: A Covenant Community.  The thrust of the article centers on the importance of the local church and membership therein.  The latter part of the lengthy (33 pages) article addressed the Presbyterian notion of membership.

Herzer writes that the Presbyterian has always understood the visible/local church to be a mixed body.  This was true of the Old Testament people of God and it is true of the New Testament people of God.  Unlike the Baptist’s, the Presbyterian does not seek to remove the proverbial “wheat from the tares.”  On page 27 he claims that the membership of the local body/church is made up of believers and their progeny.  On page 25 he writes that the requirement for membership is a credible confession, not regeneration.

This does not mean that anyone and everyone can be a member.  The operative phrase on page 25 was credible confession.  I would assume that there would come a time in the life of a believer’s child when he would have to confess Christ.  It would also be my assumption that a non-credible confession would bar membership in the local church and that out-right rejection of Christ is the OT equivalent of “being cut-off” from the covenant community.

Posted in Life, New Testament Studies | Tagged | 1 Comment

Jesus vs. Religion

 

No, I am not going to add in my two-cents about the topic.  But, if you are looking for a few critiques of the video…

Does Jesus Hate Religion? Kinda, Sorta, Not Really by Kevin DeYoung

The Problem Isn’t Religion by Justin Boulmay

and Jesus v. Religion? by Joe Heschmeyer (Justin linked to this article and I found it helpful).

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Narrative

Pastor Tyler Jones began a new sermon series this past Sunday entitled “Enter the Truth Myth.” Mythology is here defined in C.S. Lewis’ terms as the divine entering into and interacting with the natural realm. Understanding Christianity as True Myth is nothing other than the story of the incarnation; Christ, the divine Son of God, came into this world from the legend of heaven at a special time and place.

The first sermon in the series focused on four trees: the tree of life, the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, the cross, and the tree of life re-visited in the book of Revelation. The sermon was by no means earth-shattering or revelatory, but what I found to be of interest was my small group’s discussion of the sermon.

Even though Tyler spent literally 30 seconds speaking about the tree of life re-visited in Revelation, it was the element that garnered the most attention in our small group. The motif of the tree and the symbolism it carries solidified itself in all our minds. It’s mere presence in the heavenly city tells the story of fallen humanity’s inability to obtain eternal life and reconciliation without the third tree, the cross. But it also tells a story broader than individual salvation. It embodies a thematic return to Eden; God is in the business of restoration. He has healed this sin ridden world.

The impact this small story had on the minds of its hearers is what intrigues me. I found that I am not alone in viewing the biblical narrative as fascinating. Most of the written word is in the form of narrative, and for good reason. A good story grips us and stays with us. When we allow scripture to do the same, when we teach the biblical narrative as beautifully as it is presented in the text, our audience will carry it with them for years to come. It is not as if our small group was oblivious to the fact that Christ died on the cross for salvation, that there was a tree of life and a tree of the knowledge of good and evil in the garden, or even that the tree of life reappears in revelation. But what seems to escape us is the fact that God has crafted history and his work of redemption therein in a way that constantly commemorates his previous work.

I love the biblical narrative because it is subversive; we think we signed up for a story, but we are taught doctrine. Doctrine is the skeleton; God’s work in history as recorded in the biblical narrative is the flesh. At this point I cannot help but be reminded of Vanhoozer’s book The Drama of Doctrine. As the drama of our God’s work in history and the truths it reveals about himself are revealed to us in sacred scripture, we are exhorted to join the drama as God continues to work in history through his sons and daughters.

Posted in Biblical Studies, Life | Tagged | 6 Comments