“Idol Worship in Bel and the Dragon and Other Jewish Liturature from the Second Temple Period”

For those unfamiliar with the “Apocrypha,” the title Bel and the Dragon may sound like a child’s story.  Whatever you may think of the story, it is simply an addition to the book of Daniel and it has the topic of idolatry as its main interest.  Within this addition, Daniel confronts two foreign idols: Bel (an idol made of clay that supposedly eats and drinks the feast provided for him by supplicants) and the dragon (a live…well…dragon).  [spoiler alert]  They aren’t really gods.  Bel doesn’t eat and drink the meal provided him, instead the priests do.  The dragon can be and eventually is killed by Daniel’s ingenious plan to bake pitch, fat and hair into cakes and feed them to the dragon.  And now…to the article.

I must say that Claudia Bergmann’s article was one of the most pleasant and interesting reads in this book thus far.  Bergmann’s task is to compare idolatry in Second Temple Literature (~530BC-70AD).

Portrayal of Idols/Idolatry in the Hebrew Bible

  1. Idols are made with human hands
  2. Idols are inanimate (must be carried to and fro, picked up when they fall)
  3. Idols are powerless (when the impotence of idols is mentioned in the Hebrew text, it is often bracketed by praise of the LORD)
  4. Idols are perishable (they can be burned and destroyed, yet this is always done by God or as an agent of God).

Portrayal of Idols/Idolatry in 2nd Temple Lit

  1. Idols are manmade, inanimate, and powerless.
  2. Long lists of an idols inabilities virtually disappear
  3. Examination of the human psych for why humans worship idols occurs.
    1. It is an influence of cruel spirits
    2. Grief of the death brings about the immortalization of an individual
    3. Adoration of a ruler
    4. Profit
    5. A desire to have gods like the nations
  4. Comparison with the Living God is diminished
    1. Idol comparison is done with hesitancy and the material is no longer framed by praise of the LORD
    2. No mention of God’s acts, law, or covenant
    3. The text rarely ever refer to the creator/creation
    4. Bergmann postulates that this is due to the fact that topics like law, covenant, land, Exodus, and creation differintiated the Hebrews from being perceived as enlightened Hellenists.
  5. Destruction of Idols
    1. Idols are still destroyed through the wear-and-tear of elements, an inability to save themselves
    2.  Yet, idols are now destroyed by rational humans instead of by God or by humans acting as his agents

Bergmann now looks to Exodus 20:23; Jeremiah 10:6-8, 10 in order to compare the Greek and the Hebrew versions.  He observes that, while the Greek text generally is in agreement with its Hebrew parent text, when there are major differences between the texts the Greek text brought into harmony with the 2nd Temple ideology of idolatry.

Bergmann concludes the article with a look at Bel and the Dragon.  What is of most interest is the differences between the Old Greek version and Theodotion’s recension of Bel and the Dragon.  The OG version has leanings towards “wisdom literature.”  It suppresses elements about the LORD, softens the possible conversion of the Gentile king, and the destruction of the idols and priests is mitigated.  Theodotion’s  version has nationalistic leanings in that it recounts the utter destruction of the false priests, the destruction of the two idols, and the “possible” conversion of the king.

What is the main take away here?  Don’t eat baked tar, fat and hair.  Though it may smell tasty, if it can kill a dragon, it will most likely kill you!

This entry was posted in LXX and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s